The World Wide Web is an interactive community filled with millions and millions of users. The World Web Wide sponsors an environment where people can collaborate with each other by sharing ideas, and new innovations. So that is where sequential innovation comes in. I was reading the article and I was filled with tons of questions. I questioned the use of strict intellectual property laws and the purpose of taking legal action against a competitive company. The traditional intellectual property hinders the production of new ideas and the sharing of information. Was it necessary for EMI to take legal action against OLGA? I don't think so. I agree with the authors of the article. EMI could have learned from OLGA's reinterpretation of the guitar tablature site. Was OLGA a creative imitation of EMI? Is all of the legal action driven by greed, selfishness, and fear? An idea has to start somewhere but it takes a team to help an idea flourish and develop. I understand the author and artist fury with the murkiness of blurred laws and imitation rights but everyone can benefit from weaker intellectual property protection. The goal and purpose of these laws should be to learn from each other not sue X because they are using my special code to help youth upload games and interact with each other.From reading this article, I was also able to understand the true benefit of free and open source software. Everyone can access the software, add to the software, and enjoy the use of the software stress-free. Open Source software offers numerous benefits to the community of World Wide Web users. They can become proud inventors by taking a existing program and developing the program further. So I went on a quest to find the definition of Open Source software. I desired to know what was permissible and what was unlawful with the use of the software. So here goes:
The information below was found on www.opensource.org. It details the rules and regulations of the software.
"Open source is a development method for software that harnesses the power of distributed peer review and transparency of process. The promise of open source is better quality, higher reliability, more flexibility, lower cost, and an end to predatory vendor lock-in." (Quote from www.opensource.org)
Introduction
1. Free Redistribution
2. Source Code
3. Derived Works
4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code
5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups
The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons.
6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
7. Distribution of License
8. License Must Not Be Specific to a Product
Rationale: This clause forecloses yet another class of license traps.
9. License Must Not Restrict Other Software
10. License Must Be Technology-Neutral
No provision of the license may be predicated on any individual technology or style of interface.
































